Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758392›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Associations between chronotype, physical activity and cognition in a free-living setting.

Evie Holt, Benjamin Tari, Demi Ojo, Zaina Alavi, Evelyn Watson, Sarah Keating Bartlett, Flaminia Ronca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evie HoltFaculty of Health and Life Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Benjamin TariInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Demi OjoInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Zaina AlaviInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Evelyn WatsonInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah Keating BartlettInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Flaminia RoncaInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. f.ronca@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronotype is one’s inherent preferred pattern of sleep and activity within a 24 hour period. Late chronotypes in particular are prevalent among university students and have been associated with differences in physical activity and cognitive performance compared to earlier chronotypes. While these effects have been studied in isolation and in controlled settings, the interaction between chronotype, cognition and physical activity in free-living settings has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between self-reported chronotype, objective physical activity patterns, and cognitive performance in a naturalistic setting. Seventy-five young adults (age = 25 ± 7 years; 57% female) completed the Composite Morningness Questionnaire to classify chronotype, before wearing accelerometers for seven days. During this time participants completed executive function tasks at the start and end of the day, without modifying their regular sleep-wake hours. Early chronotypes were more physically active compared to late chronotypes, had an earlier time of peak activity, and exhibited shorter reaction times and fewer errors compared to late chronotypes, particularly in the morning. In fully adjusted models, end-of-day testing as well as being active in the hour prior to testing were associated with better cognitive performance. These results suggest that in free living settings, early chronotypes are associated with both better executive function and higher activity levels in the morning, but that activity levels can improve cognitive performance regardless of time of day. Further research could consider whether physical activity could be leveraged to support morning cognitive function in real-world contexts.

Indexed as

ChronotypeCircadian RhythmCognitionExecutive FunctionMotor ActivitySleepAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAccelerometeryAttentionControlExecutive functionWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41758392
PMCPMC12948795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.