ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Deep learning-based synthetic brain MRI for the assessment of regional atrophy patterns in neurodegenerative diseases.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAssessing regional brain atrophy on 3D-T1w imaging is crucial for evaluating neurodegenerative disorders. However, high-quality volumetric imaging is not always available. Thus, AI-based algorithms were developed to generate "synthetic" 3D-T1w sequences using various clinical sequences as input. This retrospective study aims to investigate whether regional atrophy patterns are preserved in deep learning-based synthetic 3D-T1w sequences from different inputs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and healthy controls (HC). Probands were scanned at 3 T, and deep learning-based synthetic 3D-T1w images were generated from various inputs (3D FLAIR, 4 mm axial FLAIR, 4 mm coronal T2) using FreeSurfer-based SynthSR. Real 3D-T1w images served as the reference standard. Brain volumetry was performed using SynthSeg+ in FreeSurfer and the AssemblyNet-AD-FTD pipeline in VolBrain.
resultsGlobal and regional volumes differed significantly between deep learning-based synthetized sequences and the reference standard 3D T1 for all subgroups and inputs (total white matter volume AD p = 0.0002, FTD p < 0.0001, HC p = 0.0116; total gray matter volume for AD, FTD, and HC p < 0.0001), except for hippocampal volumes. This systematic error in overestimating volumes affected automated disease probability prediction in FTD for all inputs (p < 0.0001) and in HC for coronal T2 input (adj. p = 0.0054).
conclusionDeep learning-based synthetic 3D-T1w sequences introduce systematic errors in assessing global and regional brain volumetric measures, leading to overestimated volumes in controls and patients. Resulting synthetic images should be used cautiously, especially for volumetric analyses. KEY POINTS: Question It remains unclear whether deep learning-based synthetic 3D-T1w images from various inputs preserve regional atrophy patterns sufficiently to serve as input for automated volumetry. Findings Deep learning-based synthetic T1w images overestimate regional and global brain volumes in neurodegenerative diseases and controls, increasing with lower quality inputs. Clinical relevance Deep learning-based synthetic images should only be used with caution for volumetric evaluation of brain MRI scans. If possible, 3D scans should be used as input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.