ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Cardiac MRI monitoring in acute myocarditis: predicting outcomes through serial imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMyocarditis is a common disease with a risk of chronic progression. The aim of this study is to assess changes in MRI parameters during serial monitoring in patients with acute myocarditis (AM), and to evaluate their prognostic implications for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective multicenter study, patients with MRI-confirmed AM between 2016 and 2020 underwent serial MRI: at baseline (6 [interquartile range (IQR), 3-10] days after symptom onset), short-term (median 36 [IQR, 33-42] days) and long-term (392 [IQR, 358-435] days). Cardiac MRI parameters, including mapping, were evaluated. MACE at 5-year follow-up were collected.
resultsA total of 105 patients (age 38 [IQR, 28-45 years]; men 75, 71%) were enrolled. Infarct-like clinical presentation (80, 76%) was the most common, followed by heart failure (18, 17%) and arrhythmia (7, 7%). MACE occurred in 20/105 patients (28.5%). Persistence of active disease using LLc 2018 was found in 91% (87) of patients at short-term and 61.5% (48) of patients at long-term MRI. Lateral LGE pattern was associated with better prognosis (HR [95% CI] = 0.19 [0.09; 0.38]; p-value < 0.0001), while scar burden at long-term MRI was associated with MACE (HR [95% CI] = 1.15 [1.07; 1.24]; p-value < 0.001). Native T1 at short-time MRI (HR [95% CI] = 1.02[1.01; 1.02]; p-value < 0.0001) and T2 mapping at long-term MRI (HR [95% CI] = 1.27[1.07; 1.52]; p-value = 0.006) resulted independent predictors of events at multivariate analysis. Changes of MRI parameters at different time points were not predictors of MACE.
conclusionCardiac MRI allows for monitoring of the healing process. Persistence of inflammation after 1 year from onset is associated with unfavorable outcomes. KEY POINTS: Question Serial cardiac MRI with mapping may provide information about myocarditis healing vs chronic progression that can be useful for risk stratification? Findings Cardiac MRI showed persistence of active disease using LLc 2018 in 91% (87/96) of patients at short-term MRI and in 61.5% (48/79) at long-term MRI. At the long term, altered T2 mapping resulted predictors of adverse events together with higher LGE burden, altered troponin and dyspnea. Clinical relevance In acute myocarditis, serial cardiac MRI allows to monitor the healing process and identify the persistence of inflammation, which is associated with chronic evolution and unfavorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41758342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.