ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Acute venous disorders: deep vein thrombosis and superficial vein thrombosis of the lower extremity : Diagnosis and treatment in dermatology practice].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) is associated with potentially serious complications such as pulmonary embolism (PE) and postthrombotic syndrome. Superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is also clinically relevant, as concomitant DVT and/or PE may already be present at initial diagnosis or may develop during follow-up.
objectiveWhich diagnostic and therapeutic steps are most relevant for dermatologists in clinical practice?
methodsOverview of the German S2k guideline and selected literature, supplemented by two case vignettes.
resultsDVT diagnostics are guided by clinical pretest probability (Wells score). In patients with low probability, a negative D‑dimer test can rule out DVT. In patients with high probability or a positive D‑dimer test, duplex compression ultrasonography is indicated. In confirmed DVT, prompt therapeutic anticoagulation is required, preferably with direct oral anticoagulants, usually for ≥ 3 months depending on provocation status and risk of recurrence. In SVT, thrombus length and proximity to the deep venous junction determine management. SVT ≥ 5 cm, marked symptoms, or relevant risk factors warrant 45 days of anticoagulation (e.g., fondaparinux 2.5 mg s.c. once daily). SVT < 3 cm from the junction or with progression into the deep venous system requires therapeutic-dose anticoagulation analogous to DVT. Short-segment distal SVT can often be managed symptomatically.
conclusionStructured risk stratification, focused diagnostic work-up, and guideline-concordant therapy are essential to prevent thromboembolic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41758231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.