Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758205›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2026

Virtual Morris Water Task: Procedures and Protocols for the Assessment of Spatial Navigation and Memory.

Conor Thornberry, Jose M Cimadevilla, Sean Commins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Conor ThornberryTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-0641
Jose M CimadevillaDepartment of Psychology and Health Research Center, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
Sean ComminsDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Co. Kildare, Kildare, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original Morris water maze has been coined the "gold standard" task for examining spatial navigation in animals. The general procedure of the maze involves a circular pool filled approximately halfway with water. An animal is then tasked with locating and recalling the position of a hidden "platform," which is submerged below the water surface in a fixed location. The platform has minimal visual presence in the pool, meaning the location of the platform must be found, learned, and recalled from memory. Recently, the task has been translated using virtual reality for use with humans (virtual Morris water task) to investigate similar cognitive mechanisms examined using the animal version of the task. However, there are multiple variations of the virtual Morris water task scattered across the human literature. These versions vary in both environmental design (e.g., different shaped arenas or platform sizes) and testing procedures (e.g., 1-min trial times or no intertrial intervals), which influence a person's ability to perform the task. While the virtual version of this task possesses the same potential to become the "gold standard" for examining spatial cognition in humans, comparing and replicating results across research labs has been incredibly difficult due the lack of standardized procedures and protocols. In this paper, we present protocols to help with the standardization of this task. We recommend practices and procedures for researching specific cognitive processes in humans, as well as reporting guidelines, recommended analyses, and expected results. © 2026 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

Maze LearningMemoryMorris Water Maze TestSpatial NavigationVirtual RealityAnimalsHumanslearningmemoryMorris water mazespatial navigationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41758205
PMCPMC12947884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.