Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758062›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2026

Relative aortic valve stiffness: a new parameter quantifying aortic stenosis.

Eric Buffle, Athanasios Papadis, Isaac Blaser, Nikolas Nozica, Mohammad Kassar, Roger Ludwig, David Berger, Matthias Hänggi, Marco Mauri, Dominik Obrist and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eric Buffle1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0002-2396-5062
Athanasios Papadis1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0002-7479-9404
Isaac Blaser1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Nikolas Nozica1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Mohammad Kassar1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Roger Ludwig3Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
David Berger3Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Matthias Hänggi3Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0001-5845-031X
Marco Mauri1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0009-0009-9081-414X
Dominik Obrist4ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Christian Seiler1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Stefano F de Marchi1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0003-3149-2944

Funding

Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung (Bangerter-Stiftung)Schweizerische Herzstiftung (HerzstiftungCH)Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) P500PM_214180UB | Bern Center for Precision Medicine, University of Bern (BCPM)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) quantification relies on transvalvular gradients or aortic valve opening area (AVA), two measures that inherently depend on the instantaneous transvalvular flow rate (Q). We present a new quantification method for AS based on new modeling where AVA saturates with increasing Q, contradicting the assumption of linear Q-AVA relation currently predominant in the literature. The objective of this study is the development of a new method for the quantification of AS. In 141 patient undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, AVA was obtained frame-by-frame over an entire systole from 3-D echocardiograms using multiplanar reconstruction. Q was retrieved by Doppler- and 3-D echocardiography of the left ventricular outflow tract. A sigmoid Q-AVA relation was fitted with a machine learning algorithm. The measured and the predicted AVA were compared between a parametrized linear and sigmoid Q-AVA relation model. A relative aortic valve stiffness (rAVS) was calculated, and an isostiffness nomogram was constructed. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to look for predictors of rehospitalization-free survival. Compared with the linear model, the sigmoid model consistently better predicted measured AVA in all AS severity groups. Within severity groups, rAVS remained robust and constant, a property not shared by the linear model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis revealed a rAVS value of 1.51 as the best cut-off for distinguishing severe from nonsevere AS. Cox proportional hazard modeling showed its value as an independent predictor of rehospitalization-free survival. We present a new method for the quantification of AS that could help simplify the diagnosis of patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiography, DopplerEchocardiography, Three-DimensionalEchocardiography, TransesophagealModels, CardiovascularAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMachine LearningMalePredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness Indexaortic stenosisechocardiographyhemodynamicsstenosis quantificationvalvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID41758062
PMCPMC7618937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.