ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2026
Relative aortic valve stiffness: a new parameter quantifying aortic stenosis.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) quantification relies on transvalvular gradients or aortic valve opening area (AVA), two measures that inherently depend on the instantaneous transvalvular flow rate (Q). We present a new quantification method for AS based on new modeling where AVA saturates with increasing Q, contradicting the assumption of linear Q-AVA relation currently predominant in the literature. The objective of this study is the development of a new method for the quantification of AS. In 141 patient undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, AVA was obtained frame-by-frame over an entire systole from 3-D echocardiograms using multiplanar reconstruction. Q was retrieved by Doppler- and 3-D echocardiography of the left ventricular outflow tract. A sigmoid Q-AVA relation was fitted with a machine learning algorithm. The measured and the predicted AVA were compared between a parametrized linear and sigmoid Q-AVA relation model. A relative aortic valve stiffness (rAVS) was calculated, and an isostiffness nomogram was constructed. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to look for predictors of rehospitalization-free survival. Compared with the linear model, the sigmoid model consistently better predicted measured AVA in all AS severity groups. Within severity groups, rAVS remained robust and constant, a property not shared by the linear model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis revealed a rAVS value of 1.51 as the best cut-off for distinguishing severe from nonsevere AS. Cox proportional hazard modeling showed its value as an independent predictor of rehospitalization-free survival. We present a new method for the quantification of AS that could help simplify the diagnosis of patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.