ReviewHepatology communications2026
Refining surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B through biomarker-based risk stratification.
Review in Hepatology communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Consensus Statements on Prevention and Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Malaysia.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) accounting for more than half of the cases. Regular surveillance, including abdominal ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein testing every 6 months, enables early tumor detection and curative treatment; however, current guideline recommendations based mainly on age, sex, and race/ethnicity insufficiently capture individual risk variation, particularly among patients with CHB who do not have cirrhosis. In addition, real-world adherence to HCC surveillance is suboptimal-fewer than 40% of eligible patients receive surveillance at the recommended 6-month intervals. To improve both efficiency and impact, surveillance resources should be reallocated to patients whose estimated risk exceeds the cost-effective surveillance threshold. Recent studies support biomarker-based risk stratification as a more precise approach. For example, in untreated CHB, HBeAg-negative patients meeting inactive disease criteria with HBsAg <100 IU/mL have an annual HCC incidence below the 0.2% cost-effectiveness threshold, suggesting that routine surveillance may be unnecessary. In antiviral-treated CHB, models such as PAGE-B and its derivatives can accurately identify low-risk patients who may safely forgo HCC surveillance. Conversely, for patients at extremely high risk, including those with cirrhosis, intensified strategies-such as abbreviated MRI or combined biomarker algorithms-may enhance early detection. Collectively, these findings support a transition from a categorical, one-size-fits-all approach toward a precision surveillance paradigm that tailors the need for and intensity of HCC surveillance to biomarker-defined risk, thereby optimizing resource use, improving adherence, and maximizing clinical benefit. Nevertheless, further large-scale, prospective studies across diverse populations are needed to validate biomarker thresholds and confirm the long-term safety of exempting very-low-risk patients with CHB from HCC surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.