Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41757840›Full record

ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2026

#infertility education on Instagram: A Reliability Analysis in Brazil Using the DISCERN Instrument.

Márcia Mendonça Carneiro, Renata Bossi, Debora Alvarenga, Ana Carolina Xavier, Rodrigo Hurtado, Marcos Sampaio, Marisa Mendonça Carneiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Márcia Mendonça CarneiroFederal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte MG Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Renata BossiORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center Belo Horizonte MG Brazil ORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Debora AlvarengaORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center Belo Horizonte MG Brazil ORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Carolina XavierORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center Belo Horizonte MG Brazil ORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rodrigo HurtadoFederal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte MG Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marcos SampaioORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center Belo Horizonte MG Brazil ORIGEN Reproductive Medicine Center, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marisa Mendonça CarneiroFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Letters Belo Horizonte MG Brazil Faculty of Letters of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence, authorship, and reliability of educational fertility-related information shared on Brazilian Instagram, measured by the DISCERN instrument.

methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed public fertility-related educational Instagram posts published in March 2021 related to the following hashtags: #infertility, #ivf, #endometriosis, #tryingtoconceive, #maternity, #humanreproduction, #pregnancy, #invitrofertilization, #assistedreproduction, #pregnant, #difficulttogetpregnant. Educational posts were evaluated using the DISCERN tool. Authorship was categorized as either healthcare professional (HCP) or layperson (LP).

resultsThe majority of the 37 analyzed posts were authored by HCP (n = 33; 89.2%), with 24 of these being physicians, five fertility clinics, four allied HCP, one magazine, and three LP. Most posts (n = 15) focused on fertility treatments; other topics included information about diseases, exams, and diagnosis. The mean Discern analysis scores for each question were: (1) Are the aims clear? 4.86; (2) Does it achieve its aims? 4.75; (3) Is it relevant? 4.47; (4) Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)? 1.58; (5) Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? 1.59; (6) Is it balanced and unbiased? 1.59; (7) Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? 1.04; (8) Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? 1.39.

conclusionsAlthough physicians authored most posts that clearly stated the aim and relevance, important issues such as the source of information used and details about additional sources of support and information were not available. The posts analyzed here failed to be balanced and unbiased and did not inform about potential areas of uncertainty.

Indexed as

infertilitypatient educationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41757840
PMCPMC13318293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.