ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
P-Score Variability as a Function of Retinopathy of Prematurity Severity.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the variability of P-score grading within the same eye during a single imaging session (P-Var) as a function of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) severity. Methods: This study analyzed retinal images from 20 consecutive subjects selected from the Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of ROP (SUNDROP) database who were screened between January 2023 and December 2024 and subsequently received treatment. Nine masked graders evaluated the P-scores of 1597 images from 129 imaging sessions. Variability was measured through calculation of range, intergrader reliability, and agreement metrics. Probabilistic modeling was conducted to assess the impact of limited image sampling on disease classification. Results: Significant P-score variability was observed within single eye visits, increasing with worsening vascular disease (maximum eye visit P-score: β = 0.222, P < 0.001) and overall disease severity as assessed with the Telemedicine ROP Severity Score (β = 0.0073, P < 0.001). Intergrader agreement for the nine graders was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.71). Mean ± SD weighted kappa was 0.66 ± 0.10 between grader pairs. Exact P-score agreement was 28.5% ± 5.6%, improving to 72.5% ± 8.2% when allowing a ±1 P-score unit difference. The coefficient of variation of image-level P-scores between graders decreased with worsening disease. Probabilistic modeling demonstrated that limited image sampling with fewer than five views per eye can lead to significant misclassification, particularly in plus eyes. Conclusions: P-score variability exists within the same imaging session and increases with disease severity. These findings suggest that multiple images per session are necessary for accurate disease classification, particularly in eyes with more severe disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.