ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
CRISPR Base Editing Correction of TGFBI Mutations in Autosomal Dominant Corneal Dystrophies.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TGFBI in tumors and the tumor immune microenvironment: functional roles, mechanisms, and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Lattice and granular corneal dystrophy comprise two common TGFBI-associated autosomal dominant corneal disorders. Existing therapies are only temporizing and carry significant morbidity. Here, we develop a novel therapeutic approach using an adenine base editor (ABE) to correct common TGFBI mutations. Method: We generated two human corneal epithelial (HCE) cell models harboring a copy of the most common disease-causing TGBFI mutations, R124C or R555W. These lines were electroporated with an ABE8e-NG-encoding mRNA and guide RNAs targeting the mutations. The resulting A•T-to-G•C editing efficiencies and off-target (OT) effects were assessed by amplicon sequencing. GFP-expressing adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) with different capsid types were transduced into HCE cells and healthy human corneal donor tissues, and GFP fluorescence was evaluated. Results: Using all-RNA delivery for ABE8e-NG, we achieved 91% and 62% correction of the pathogenic adenines in HCE TGFBIR124C/WT and TGFBIR555W/WT cells, without editing the wild-type allele. Indel formation was negligible (<0.2%), bystander adenine editing was minimal (<0.7%), and editing at top computationally predicted OT sites was modest (<1.2% at all but 1 of the 20 OT sites analyzed), suggesting minimal safety concerns. Correction of TGFBIR124C/WT in HCEs rescued the aberrant lysosomal localization of TGFBI. We further identified AAV1 as the most effective serotype for gene delivery into both human corneal donor tissue and HCE cells. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of CRISPR adenine base editing as a new therapeutic strategy for correcting common TGFBI mutations in corneal dystrophies, paving the way for further preclinical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.