Trial reportJournal of global health2026
Design and methodology of a cluster-randomised controlled trial on cash plus interventions for preventing child wasting in Somalia.
Trial report in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06642012 (Comparing Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Cash Plus Interventions in Preventing Acute Malnutrition in Somalia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Cash Plus Interventions in Preventing Acute Malnutrition in Somalia
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the correlates of wasting among children under five and their mothers in the Bay and Hiran regions of Somalia.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Somalia is a conflict, flood, and drought prone country with high rates of food insecurity and child wasting. Save the Children partnered with Johns Hopkins University to study the most effective and cost-effective combinations of assistance to prevent acute malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women (PLW) and children under five (CU5) in a six-month humanitarian programme. This study implemented an cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) using adaptive design methodology to: (1) estimate and compare wasting incidence and prevalence of CU5 and their mothers receiving on a monthly basis either cash (Arm 1), cash + social and behaviour change communication (Arm 2), or cash + top-up cash (Arm 3); after three months and six months; (2) calculate the costs and cost-effectiveness of the different intervention arms; (3) understand perspectives and experiences of mothers and fathers of CU5 beneficiaries; (4) monitor the functionality of markets and availability and prices of foods. This paper presents the approach that was designed and implemented to study these objectives. Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach with a quantitative component conducted at three time points to collect anthropometric measurements and household survey data. Primary outcomes, such as child and maternal wasting, were assessed using standardised World Health Organization criteria. Additional data on food security, maternal and child health, and household conditions were collected to evaluate immediate, underlying, and basic causes of malnutrition. Cost analyses evaluated programmatic and societal costs of the intervention. An adaptive trial design was implemented, allowing the methodology to evolve as new challenges emerged. Conclusions: This trial applied an adaptive mixed methods design to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cash assistance interventions in Somalia, overcoming complex humanitarian operational challenges. Strong partnerships and flexible trial design allowed us to adjust to unpredictable events and maintain research rigor. These findings highlight the value of adaptive designs and mixed methods for improving child nutrition outcomes in complex settings. Registration: The cluster-RCT is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06642012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.