ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2026
Long-term field safety study evaluating allogeneic, uterine-derived mesenchymal stem cells for refractory feline chronic gingivostomatitis.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot study demonstrating safety and efficacy of intravenous allogeneic uterine-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in cats with naturally occurring osteoarthritis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesThe study primarily evaluated the long-term safety of intravenous, allogeneic uterine-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UMSCs) for client-owned cats affected with refractory feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS). Effectiveness during this long-term extension, when other medications were allowed, was also evaluated.MethodsThis prospective, multisite, open-label extension study evaluated cats with refractory FCGS after partial- or full-mouth extractions and persistent clinical signs despite medical management. During the initial trial, cats received two intravenous doses of 20 million UMSCs 14 days apart. No additional UMSC dosing occurred during the present follow-up period. A total of 35 cats were enrolled through day 365. Safety assessments included physical examination, owner-reported observations and clinicopathology. Clinical outcomes were evaluated descriptively using owner-reported assessment of overall response (ORA) and veterinarian-assessed global oral lesion score (GOLS). Concomitant medications were permitted.ResultsNo serious adverse events (AEs) were associated with UMSC administration, and no clinically relevant abnormalities were observed via hematology or urinalysis. The most common AEs temporally associated with dosing were transient nausea, vomiting, tachypnea, diarrhea, hypersalivation and pyrexia. At 1 year, 69% of cats gained weight (mean increase of 16.2%). Improvement in ORA at days 180 and 365 was 75.8% and 65.6%, respectively. Improvement in GOLS at days 180 and 365 was 51.5% and 46.9%, respectively. Mean reduction in lesion score at 1 year was 33%, with 22% of cats achieving clinical cure. Of the cats, 66% did not restart medical therapy after UMSC treatment, with only 8.6% continuing an immunosuppressant drug.Conclusions and relevanceRepeated intravenous UMSC therapy in cats with refractory FCGS appears safe in the long term, with no reported immunogenic or tumorigenic safety concerns. Clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life were maintained out to 1 year, with concurrent medication use as needed, and most cats were able to discontinue immunosuppressant medications. These results support the safe use of UMSCs for refractory FCGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.