ArticleMedical physics2026
A voxel-wise uncertainty-guided framework for glioma segmentation using spherical projection-based U-Net and localized refinement.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of glioma subregions from multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) is critical for clinical management but remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and ambiguous tissue boundaries. PURPOSE: This study proposes an uncertainty-guided hybrid segmentation framework that integrates spherical projection-based 2D modeling with localized 3D refinement to improve segmentation fidelity.
methodsThe framework was validated on the BraTS 2020 dataset (N = 369). First, a 2D nnU-Net with spherical projection deformation was employed to generate initial slice-wise predictions. Crucially, prediction variance across multiple spherical projections was utilized to quantify voxel-level uncertainty, highlighting regions of low model confidence. A kernel-based sliding window algorithm then spatially localized 3D subvolumes with high cumulative uncertainty. These targeted regions were subsequently fed into a dedicated 3D nnU-Net for volumetric refinement. Finally, the global 2D predictions and local 3D refinements were adaptively fused using weights optimized via Particle Swarm Optimization. The proposed method was implemented to segment the enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC) and whole tumor (WT). Performance was evaluated against standalone 2D and 3D nnU-Net baselines using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), HD95, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe proposed method significantly outperformed 2D and 3D baselines across ET, TC, and WT targets. Notably, it achieved a DSC of 0.8124 for ET (vs. 0.7527 for 2D and 0.7530 for 3D), 0.7499 for TC (vs. 0.7002 for 2D and 0.7027 for 3D), 0.9055 for WT (vs. 0.8989 for 2D and 0.9038 for 3D) and demonstrated consistent gains in HD95 and sensitivity. Quantitative metrics and visualizations confirmed improved spatial coherence and boundary preservation in structurally complex regions.
conclusionBy utilizing interpretable uncertainty maps as a spatial attention mechanism, this approach dynamically allocates computational resources to anatomically ambiguous regions. The resulting hybrid framework successfully combines 2D efficiency with 3D contextual accuracy, offering a robust solution for automated glioma segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.