Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41757377›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026

Final-year undergraduate nursing and medical students' knowledge, perception, orientation and perceived self-efficacy to provide palliative and end-of-life care: Qualitative findings from a parallel mixed-methods study.

Germanus Natuhwera, Peter Ellis, Eve Namisango

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Germanus NatuhweraClinical & Administration Departments, Little Hospice Hoima, Hospice Africa Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-4063
Peter EllisIndependent Nursing Writer and Educator, London, UK.
Eve NamisangoResearch and Programmes Department, African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: About a decade after the introduction of palliative care teaching for undergraduate nurses and medical students in Uganda, it is unclear to what extent the course impacts students' understanding, perceptions and orientation to deliver palliative and end-of-life care. Objectives: To (1) explore final-year nursing and medical students' knowledge and perceptions of palliative and end-of-life care, (2) examine students' orientation and perceived self-efficacy to provide palliative and end-of-life-care. Design: A multicentre exploratory qualitative study. Methods: A total of 82 undergraduate nursing and medical students were selected from seven medical and nursing schools in Uganda. Data were collected through 10 face-to-face focus group discussions using a pilot-tested interview guide and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Five master themes emerged: (1) Palliative care as a concept with multiple meanings, (2) Misinformation about palliative care, opiates and pain management, (3) Students' experiences of the course, (4) Dilemmas in knowledge and action, and (5) Palliative and end-of-life care as emotional labour. Conclusion: Participants generally had inadequate and varied understanding of, and very few demonstrated low willingness and limited confidence to provide, palliative and end-of-life care. They blamed this mainly on the huge emotional labour of palliative/end-of-life care and inadequate teaching and/or limited clinical exposure.

Indexed as

end-of-life careknowledgemedicalnursingorientationpalliative careself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID41757377
PMCPMC12932897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.