ReviewBMJ oncology2026
Cancer care in wartime Ukraine: disruption, resilience and recovery.
Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Russian invasion on radiation therapy capacity in Ukraine: a national survey study.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Cancer pain and its impact on quality of life, distress, and spiritual well-being in the war-torn Gaza Strip.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Rethinking cancer care in conflict settings: lessons from Ukraine.BMJ oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer care continuity under 2026 regional gulf conflict: experiences and a resilience framework from the Gulf States.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Before Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine maintained a well-functioning oncology system, supported by universal health coverage and expanding access to advanced diagnostics and clinical trials. The war caused profound disruptions across all aspects of cancer care-diagnostics, treatment, research and palliative support-yet the system demonstrated exceptional resilience. While hospitals in combat zones were forced to pivot to trauma care, oncology facilities in safer regions were rapidly reorganised and adapted. By late summer 2022, core cancer care in government-controlled territories largely recovered to near pre-war levels through coordinated leadership, emergency regulations and international support, though this recovery remains fragile and uneven, with some patients still facing barriers related to displacement, insecurity and disrupted pathways. Partnerships with the WHO, European Union and oncology societies helped with drug supply, telemedicine, workforce training and patient evacuation abroad. Despite early shortages, drug and radiotherapy capacity has rebounded, aided by modernisation efforts and advocacy networks. Clinical trials, initially halted, are being gradually restored under decentralised and cross-border collaboration models. Grassroots and non-profit organisations have been essential for patient navigation and advocacy, also addressing challenges of treatment delays, drug access, psychological support and palliative care. Looking ahead, Ukraine's National Cancer Control Strategy 2030 prioritises workforce development, early cancer detection and quality improvement to strengthen system resilience. Ukraine's experience demonstrates that even amid prolonged conflict, coordinated governance, adaptive regulation and international collaboration can sustain complex cancer care and offers a practical framework for rebuilding oncology and other non-communicable disease services in conflict-affected settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.