ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Optimizing wearable IMU configurations for running gait analysis: a machine learning-based sensor fusion approach.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Robust Deep Learning Framework for Skill Level Discrimination in Tennis Strokes Using Bilateral IMU Measurements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable and Subject-Independent VOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Measuring Walking Stability with a Mobile Phone in Older Adults: A Validation Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study applies machine learning (ML) techniques to address this hardware limitation by determining the feasibility of reducing a high-dimensional 17-sensor network to a "minimal-optimal" subset without compromising measurement accuracy. Unlike previous studies focusing on activity classification, we systematically quantify the information redundancy in kinematic chains to optimize sensor fusion architectures. Methods: Twenty-five recreational runners performed treadmill protocols at three speeds (8, 10, and 12 km/h) while wearing a gold-standard Xsens MVN system (17 IMUs). Raw accelerometer and gyroscope signals were programmatically subsetted to simulate minimal configurations. A Random Forest (RF) regression model was selected after benchmarking against baseline Linear Regression and deep learning (LSTM) models. A comprehensive vector of time-and frequency-domain features was extracted via sliding windows, and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was applied to identify the most critical signal attributes. Results: Analysis revealed that a single lumbosacral IMU could successfully reconstruct global parameters (Cadence, Vertical Oscillation, Ground Contact Time) with high precision ( Conclusion: This study validates a machine learning framework for optimizing sensor array design. The proposed three-sensor fusion offers a robust, low-cost architectural blueprint for next-generation wearable devices, proving that complex deep learning is not always required when sensor placement is biomechanically optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.