ArticleNature machine intelligence2026
Cardiac health assessment across scenarios and devices using a multimodal foundation model pretrained on data from 1.7 million individuals.
Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Contact Conditions in Wearable Reflectance Photoplethysmography: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- From Biosignals to Bedside: A Review of Real-Time Edge Machine Learning for Wearable Health Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A multimodal generative model for structured and unstructured electronic health records.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Heart rate dynamics in polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: from heterogeneity to wearable digital phenotyping.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain a major contributor to the global burden of healthcare, highlighting the importance of accurate and scalable methods for cardiac monitoring. Cardiac biosignals, most notably electrocardiograms (ECG) and photoplethysmograms, are essential for diagnosing, preventing and managing cardiovascular conditions across clinical and home settings. However, their acquisition varies substantially across scenarios and devices, whereas existing analytical models often rely on homogeneous datasets and static bespoke models, limiting their robustness and generalizability in diverse real-world contexts. Here we present a cardiac sensing foundation model (CSFM) that leverages transformer architectures and a generative masked pretraining strategy to learn unified representations from heterogeneous health records. CSFM is pretrained on a multimodal integration of data from various large-scale datasets, comprising cardiac signals from approximately 1.7 million individuals and their corresponding clinical or machine-generated text reports. The embeddings derived from CSFM act as effective, transferable features across diverse cardiac sensing scenarios, supporting a seamless adaptation to the varied input configurations and sensor modalities. Extensive evaluations across diagnostic tasks, demographic recognition, vital sign measurement, clinical outcome prediction and ECG question answering demonstrate that CSFM consistently outperforms traditional one-modal-one-task approaches. Notably, CSFM maintains favourable performance across both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs, as well as in scenarios involving ECG only, photoplethysmogram only or a combination of both. This highlights its potential as a versatile and scalable foundation for comprehensive cardiac monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.