Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Dermomina
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) remain a major global health burden, frequently leading to lower limb amputations, reduced quality of life, and premature mortality. Despite advances in multidisciplinary care, healing outcomes remain suboptimal, particularly in infected ulcers and in low resource settings. There is a need to explore accessible and cost effective adjunctive therapies that may support wound healing and improve outcomes. Methods: A pre experimental observational study was conducted at two wound care units in the Dominican Republic between March 2022 and October 2024. Dermomina clay was applied as a topical adjunct in 24 patients with Wagner grade 1 to 3 diabetic foot ulcers. Patients were stratified according to infection status. Outcomes included time to granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, complete ulcer closure, and safety. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore clinical and wound related factors associated with healing. Results: Fourteen patients presented with non infected ulcers and ten with clinically infected ulcers. Non infected ulcers demonstrated significantly faster healing trajectories and higher closure rates compared with infected ulcers. Median time to complete closure was shorter in the non infected group, and complete closure by week 20 was achieved in 92.9 percent of non infected ulcers compared with 40.0 percent of infected ulcers. Factors associated with delayed healing included age greater than 60 years, HbA1c greater than 7 percent, baseline wound size greater than 20 square centimeters, presence of infection, and higher Wagner grade. Adverse events were infrequent, mild, and transient, with no treatment discontinuations. Conclusion: Topical application of Dermomina clay was associated with favorable healing outcomes and a good safety profile, particularly in non infected diabetic foot ulcers. Although causal inference cannot be established, these findings support further evaluation of clay based therapies as low cost adjunctive interventions in diabetic foot care. Larger, controlled trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and define the role of Dermomina within evidence based management strategies for diabetic foot ulcers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.