Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41757228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2026

Hierarchical forecasting of COVID-19 cases in Africa using machine learning models.

Claris Shoko, Caston Sigauke, Katleho Makatjane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claris ShokoDepartment of Statistics, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Caston SigaukeDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.
Katleho MakatjaneDepartment of Statistics and Population Studies, University of the Western Cape, Capetown, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges for public health systems, especially in Africa, where data scarcity, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and regional disparities hindered effective forecasting and response efforts. Conventional forecasting methods have faced challenges in adequately addressing the complexity and detail necessary for effective policy interventions at various administrative levels. This study examines the challenge of producing accurate and coherent forecasts of COVID-19 cases within the hierarchical structure of Africa, which includes the continental, regional, and national levels. Methods: To establish a comprehensive forecasting model that uses hierarchical time series forecasting through a bottom-up reconciliation approach augmented by machine learning algorithms. We employ extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest models, subsequently improving predictive accuracy via a weighted average ensemble method. We produce forecasts at the national level and then aggregate them to ensure consistency across all hierarchical levels. The models are evaluated in comparison to conventional methods such as ARIMA and exponential smoothing. Results: Empirical findings indicate that XGBoost is the best among all the single forecast models used in this study, combining forecasts from the XGBoost with the random forest and assigning more weights to the XGBoost surpasses all other models in the area of mean absolute error, root mean square error, and mean absolute scale error. Results further revealed that Southern Africa, despite its low population density, reported the highest number of cases, indicating underlying health vulnerabilities and socioeconomic factors. In summary, the bottom-up HTSF method, when combined with machine learning, serves as an effective tool for forecasting in environments with limited data availability. Discussion: It is advisable to apply similar models to other infectious diseases and to expand their use to guide health interventions, resource allocation, and early warning systems in future pandemics.

Indexed as

bottom-up reconciliationensemblehierarchical time seriesrandom forestweighted averageXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41757228
PMCPMC12932500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.