ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Perioperative diffuse optical imaging of blood flow distributions for porcine skin flap viability assessment.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis remains a major complication in implant-based breast reconstruction due to inadequate tissue blood flow. Existing diagnostic technologies are limited by shallow depth sensitivity, dye-related risks, contact requirements, and an inability to continuously assess blood flow. Aim: This study aimed to translate a noncontact, dye-free, depth-sensitive speckle contrast diffuse correlation tomography (scDCT) technique to a clinically relevant porcine skin flap model for assessing flap blood flow and viability. Approach: The scDCT system was optimized to image blood flow over seven days in four porcine skin flaps including Sham (SH), Implant (IM), Half Necrosis (HN), and Full Necrosis (FN). Measurements were compared with indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) as a reference standard. Results: scDCT enabled longitudinal monitoring of flap blood flow, revealing significant flow differences among flap types and over time. FN flaps consistently exhibited the most severe flow impairment, while other flap types showed partial or complete recovery over time, distinguishing nonviable from viable tissue. scDCT measurements demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with ICG-A across time points. Conclusions: The findings support scDCT as a promising perioperative imaging modality for improving flap necrosis risk stratification and surgical decision-making, with future work focused on large-scale validation and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.