ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Circumventing the synthesizability problem in generative molecular design.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generative structure-based drug design (SBDD) models have shown great promise to accelerate our ability to discover novel drug candidates. However, these models have been criticized for producing compounds that are not very synthesizable, and therefore not practically applicable to drug design. In this work, we propose a way to circumvent the synthesizability issue by introducing a model-guided virtual screening (MGVS) pipeline which pairs SBDD models with efficient chemical similarity search methods to identify synthesizable analogs of generated compounds in existing ultra-large compound databases. Using this approach, we demonstrate that synthesizable analogs of generated compounds with equivalent or better docking scores and similar predicted binding poses can be reliably identified across a wide range of protein targets. We find that MGVS outperforms standard virtual ligand screening (VLS), consistently yielding at least a 25x improvement in screening efficiency across three different SBDD models. As drug-like chemical spaces continue to grow and standard VLS methods focused on exhaustive screening become increasingly impractical, approaches like MGVS that effectively narrow the search space will become critical for advancing drug discovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.