Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41757002›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.

Miles D Roberts, Emily B Josephs

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miles D RobertsGenetics and Genome Sciences Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-701X
Emily B JosephsDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Funding

Plant Biotechnology for Health and SustainabilityT32GM110523 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LAST, ROBERT LOUIS · 2014 to 2023
$2.2M
Determining the evolutionary forces shaping genotype-by-environment interactionsR35GM142829 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPHS, EMILY · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142829NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM110523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting signatures of positive selection in genomes is a common application of population genetics and one of the most influential models for this task is the hard selective sweep where a de novo mutation rapidly fixes. Many statistics have been developed to detect hard sweeps, often attempting to summarize signatures left behind in the site frequency, spectrum, linkage disequilibrium, and haplotype frequency. However, potentially undiscovered signals could still exist. We attempted to test whether any undiscovered signatures of hard sweeps exist by comparing machine learning models, which can learn signatures from raw data without any prior knowledge, to known summary statistics for inferring the time to fixation

Indexed as

Approximate Bayesian ComputationMachine LearningSelective sweepsTime to fixation

Identifiers

PMID41757002
PMCPMC12934701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.