Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756922›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Building Goal-Directed Cognitive Graphs.

Adithya Gungi, Pradyumna Sepúlveda, Ines F Aitsahalia, Marta Blanco-Pozo, Kiyohito Iigaya

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adithya GungiDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Pradyumna SepúlvedaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Ines F AitsahaliaCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience and Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Marta Blanco-Pozo2CNC Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Kiyohito IigayaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-8432

Funding

ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCET32NS064929 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Laurence F. Abbott, Roudabeh Behnia · 2009 to 2026
$2.9M
Computational Dissection of Neural Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Anticipatory Anhedonia in SchizophreniaR01MH136214 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kiyohito Iigaya · 2025 to 2026
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH136214NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064929Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible behavior requires building internal structured models from experience to support goal-directed action. Although environmental transition statistics accumulate gradually, how they are used to construct a compact goal-directed graph remains unclear. We introduce the Sparse Cognitive Graph (SCG), a reinforcement-learning framework that separates gradual transition learning from the sparse directed graph that governs valuation and action selection. In the SCG, transition statistics accumulate in a dense predictive representation, while nonlinear selection determines which transitions are expressed as graph edges. Consequently, gradual strengthening can trigger discrete reorganization of graph topology and abrupt behavioral shifts. Across human reward and transition revaluation tasks, the SCG explains bimodal and trimodal behavioral regimes as emergent consequences of distinct graph configurations. Across human and mouse two-step tasks, dynamic graph reconfiguration captures canonical reward-by-transition interactions without requiring mixtures of control systems. In mice, transitions preceding reward strengthened more rapidly, biasing graph topology toward reward-directed paths. Temporally precise optogenetic dopamine stimulation produced behavioral effects consistent with accelerated graph edge formation predicted by the SCG. The model further generates a testable prediction: graph topology determines the geometry of low-dimensional population activity. Directed acyclic graphs yield activity concentrated at graph entry and goal states, whereas cyclic graphs produce periodic, grid-like structure. Together, these findings identify reward-dependent graph reorganization as a computational principle that reconciles stable predictive learning with efficient goal-directed control.

Identifiers

PMID41756922
PMCPMC12934822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.