ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Building Goal-Directed Cognitive Graphs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible behavior requires building internal structured models from experience to support goal-directed action. Although environmental transition statistics accumulate gradually, how they are used to construct a compact goal-directed graph remains unclear. We introduce the Sparse Cognitive Graph (SCG), a reinforcement-learning framework that separates gradual transition learning from the sparse directed graph that governs valuation and action selection. In the SCG, transition statistics accumulate in a dense predictive representation, while nonlinear selection determines which transitions are expressed as graph edges. Consequently, gradual strengthening can trigger discrete reorganization of graph topology and abrupt behavioral shifts. Across human reward and transition revaluation tasks, the SCG explains bimodal and trimodal behavioral regimes as emergent consequences of distinct graph configurations. Across human and mouse two-step tasks, dynamic graph reconfiguration captures canonical reward-by-transition interactions without requiring mixtures of control systems. In mice, transitions preceding reward strengthened more rapidly, biasing graph topology toward reward-directed paths. Temporally precise optogenetic dopamine stimulation produced behavioral effects consistent with accelerated graph edge formation predicted by the SCG. The model further generates a testable prediction: graph topology determines the geometry of low-dimensional population activity. Directed acyclic graphs yield activity concentrated at graph entry and goal states, whereas cyclic graphs produce periodic, grid-like structure. Together, these findings identify reward-dependent graph reorganization as a computational principle that reconciles stable predictive learning with efficient goal-directed control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.