Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756919›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Drug-Target Interaction Prediction with PIGLET.

Kristy A Carpenter, Russ B Altman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristy A CarpenterDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4570-5170
Russ B AltmanDepartments of Bioengineering, Genetics, Biomedical Data Science, and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3859-2905

Funding

Computational methods for characterizing sources of variability in drug responseR35GM153195 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUSS BIAGIO ALTMAN · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
Predicting adverse drug reactions via networks of drug binding pocket similarityF31GM151783 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARPENTER, KRISTY · 2023 to 2024
$90k
NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM151783NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM153195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction is a key task for computed-aided drug development that has been widely approached by deep learning models. Despite extremely high reported performance, these models have yet to find widespread success in accelerating real-world drug discovery. In contrast with the most common approach of creating embeddings from one-dimensional or three-dimensional representations of the input drug and input target, we create a novel graph transformer method for DTI prediction that operates on a proteome-wide knowledge graph of binding pocket similarity, protein-protein interactions, drug similarity, and known binding relationships. We benchmark our method, named PIGLET, against existing DTI prediction models on the Human dataset. We assess performance with two different splitting strategies: the frequently-reported random split, and a novel, more rigorous drug-based split. All models perform similarly well on the random split, and PIGLET outperforms all models on the drug-based split. We highlight the utility of PIGLET through a real-world drug discovery case study.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryDrug-Target InteractionGraph Neural NetworkKnowledge Graph

Identifiers

PMID41756919
PMCPMC12934570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.