ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Leveraging Large Language Models to Extract Prognostic Pathology Features in Ewing Sarcoma.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Current risk stratification for Ewing sarcoma relies heavily on clinical factors such as metastatic status, failing to capture histologic heterogeneity as a potential prognostic indicator. Although pathology reports contain rich biological data, this information remains locked in unstructured narrative text, limiting large-scale retrospective analyses. We aimed to validate the utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) for scalable data abstraction and to identify prognostic histologic features from a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from six Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials. We utilized an LLM-based pipeline (OpenAI o3) to extract structured variables-including immunohistochemical (IHC) markers and CD99 staining patterns-from digitized, Optical Character Recognition (OCR)-processed pathology reports. Extraction accuracy was validated against a human-annotated ground truth (n=200) and cross-validated against senior experts (n=48). We assessed the association between extracted features and Overall Survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for metastatic status. Findings: We analyzed 931 diagnostic pathology reports from 185 institutions spanning over 21-years. The LLM achieved a weighted average accuracy of 94% across 17 IHC markers; in a cross-validation subset, the LLM outperformed human annotators (weighted average accuracy over 15 IHC markers: LLM o3: 98.1%, a pediatric resident 91.4%, and a pediatric oncologist 95.9%). Survival analysis identified Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) and S100 as significant prognostic biomarkers. After adjusting for metastatic status, NSE positivity was associated with significantly inferior survival (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.15-4.02, p=0.016); this risk was most pronounced in patients with non-metastatic disease (HR 5.64, p=0.0055). Conversely, S100 positivity was associated with improved survival (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-1.00, p=0.046). Interpretation: LLM-assisted extraction of pathology variables is highly accurate and scalable, capable of unlocking "dark data" from historical clinical trials. We identified NSE as a potent risk factor and S100 as a protective marker in Ewing sarcoma, particularly in localized disease. These findings suggest that AI-derived histologic data can refine risk stratification and, if validated, warrant inclusion in future prospective trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.