ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A Novel Method for Across-Chromosome Phasing without Relative Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationAcross-chromosome phasing identifies which haplotypes of different chromosomes come from the same parent. This differs from within-chromosome phasing, which uses linkage disequilibrium patterns to determine which alleles were co-inherited within each chromosome but does not match haplotypes across different chromosomes. While across-chromosome phasing can be conducted using genotypes from parents or close relatives, current methods perform poorly for samples of unrelated individuals. Here, we introduce a novel approach for across-chromosome phasing that employs a window-based SNP-similarity metric, eliminating the need for data from close relatives or detection of identical-by-descent haplotypes.
resultsUsing UK Biobank offspring with both parents genotyped as a gold standard, we evaluated the performance of our method by phasing the offspring without using parental data. In genomic data with no within-chromosomal phase errors, our algorithm achieved a mean across-chromosome phasing accuracy of 95%, with 53% of individuals phased perfectly. When data was pre-phased computationally using a standard within-chromosomal phasing algorithm, mean accuracy for across-chromosome phasing dropped to 83.1%. Thus, our method is limited primarily by the accuracy of within-chromosome phasing, and can approach near perfect across-chromosome phasing accuracy as within-chromosome phasing accuracy improves.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.