ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2026
Management of infected flexor tendon injuries: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Flexor tendon injuries are a common result of trauma to the hand. The mechanisms of injury often result in open wounds with contamination and infection. The complications associated with infected wounds pose challenges to flexor tendon repair. Management entails adequate eradication of infection and tissue healing prior to tendon repair. Whilst guidelines exist for the management of flexor tendon injuries of the hand, the literature puts little emphasis on the management of these cases with the presence of concomitant infection. Creating clear outlines to adequately manage such cases would aid future management for optimal outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of literature was conducted. Articles published in English within the last 20 years were used. Results: Wounds with macroscopic wound contamination should receive empiric antibiotics. There is little evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics. Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis should be immediately taken to theatre. If possible, primary tendon repair is the ideal method of repair, however this is often limited by infection. The choice of secondary reconstruction depends on timing and extent of injury. If there is loss of nerve function, a tendon transfer is required. Tendon grafts are used in cases of loss of tendon length. A damaged tendon sheath requires two-stage tendon reconstruction. Conclusion: Infected wounds are a common complicating presenting factor in flexor tendon injuries. Empiric antibiotics in complex and contaminated wounds is essential. Primary tendon repairs have the best outcomes, however repair should be withheld until granulation tissue develops. Secondary repair options should be looked at on a case-specific basis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.