Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756801›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026

Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of QMix, electrochemically activated water, ozonated water, and triphala against

Gaudam Vijegopal, Udai Pratap Singh, Reveena Merrin Benny, Aravinth Kumar, Shruthi Lakshmi, Supriya Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaudam VijegopalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Elaiyampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Udai Pratap SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Reveena Merrin BennyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Elaiyampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Aravinth KumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Elaiyampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shruthi LakshmiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Elaiyampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Supriya BhattDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Antimicrobial Efficacy of 4 New Irrigants against Aim: This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of various irrigants in combating Materials and Methods: A total of 75 teeth were decoronated. Root canals were prepared up to size 25. Roots were inoculated with Statistical Analysis: Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni test. Results: Group I showed the highest efficacy, followed by Group II, Group III, Group IV, and Group V. Conclusion: Qmix showed good promise as an effective irrigant.

Indexed as

chlorhexidineColony-forming unitelectrochemically activatedEnterococcus faecalisNaOCl

Identifiers

PMID41756801
PMCPMC12935439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.