ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Preliminary In Vivo Evaluation of Coracoclavicular Ligament Mechanics During Shoulder Elevation After Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In vivo assessment of the subacromial space during shoulder elevation following acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Persistent instability and altered scapular mechanics after acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) reconstruction may stem from inadequate replication of native coracoclavicular (CC) ligament function. However, in vivo data on postoperative CC ligament behavior during dynamic shoulder motion remain lacking. Purpose: To assess in vivo functional distance and timing characteristics of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments during active shoulder elevation after ACJ reconstruction, using dynamic stereo x-ray (DSX) imaging and patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) models. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Twelve participants (10 men and 2 women, mean age 39 ± 10 years, mean body mass 92 ± 17 kg) who had sustained an acute unilateral ACJ disruption (Rockwood classification of 3-5) and undergone anatomic ACJ reconstruction were recruited within 1 to 3 years after surgery. Participants underwent 3D computed tomography (CT) and DSX imaging to capture abduction, scaption, and flexion movements. Patient-specific bone models with digitized CC insertion points were then aligned within each frame of the biplanar radiograph images. From this, the peak functional distance, time at peak, and displacement were measured and compared with the uninjured limb. Results: Compared with uninjured limbs, the reconstructed limb demonstrated increased conoid and trapezoid peak distances of 23% and 17% between insertion points, respectively, across abduction, flexion, and scaption. Additionally, the conoid and trapezoid reached these peak distances at later stages of the movement cycle, and experienced increased displacement by 2.7 and 1.8 mm, respectively, in the reconstructed limb. Conclusion: This investigation established the methodological feasibility of using DSX combined with patient-specific CT models to quantify in vivo ligament behavior during functional shoulder motion. It further identified significant asymmetries in the functional distance between conoid and trapezoid ligament insertion points when comparing reconstructed and uninjured limbs across multiple shoulder elevation movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.