ArticleJAMIA open2026
SynNER: syntax-infused named entity recognition in the biomedical domain.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the usefulness of explicit syntactic knowledge, integrated via a neural mechanism, in improving the accuracy of named entity recognition in the domain of biomedical text processing. Materials and Methods: Syntactic structure of a text can be helpful to determine whether a certain part of the text is an entity or not. Parsing is an essential technique in natural language processing (NLP) that can be utilized to determine the syntactic structure of sentences in human languages. We propose to infuse syntactic knowledge through the attention mechanism using dependency parsing and sequence labelling parsing, as well as the multi-task learning paradigm. Experiments were conducted on five datasets: MTSamples, VAERS, NCBI-disease, BC2GM, and JNLPBA. Results: We demonstrate improvements in the F1 score over the current state of the art on 3 out of 5 datasets (MTSamples, VAERS, and NCBI). Discussion: We reduce the number of mismatches with gold labels in particular in the n-dash and parentheses tokens and in compound and adjective modifier dependencies. Conclusion: Syntactic features improve NER accuracy in attention-based neural systems, and parsing as sequence labelling brings additional benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.