ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development
Interprofessional Collaboration and Interprofessional Education Interventions in Clinical Healthcare Settings: A Realist Review.
Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- UK-Africa Leadership Fellowship for Antimicrobial Stewardship (UK-ALF-A): A Bilateral Learning Approach to Advancing AMS Expertise Among Pharmacists.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring how interprofessional forces shape population-health competencies for clinical pharmacy trainees.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and interprofessional education (IPE) are two concepts that have gained interest during the last decade, for the positive change they enable, especially in clinical healthcare settings. Despite this surge of attention, there are few studies that systematically analyse interventions aiming at fostering IPC/IPE within clinical teams. Developing additional knowledge around factors that impact the efficiency of similarly targeted interventions can help improve the quality of patient care in clinical settings. To this end, the paper offers a systematic, realist review of the IPC/IPE interventions outlined in the literature, seeking to better understand how the context and mechanisms which shape these interventions interact to produce the desired outcomes (ie, improve IPC). Electronic databases searched were PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and were analysed independently by two reviewers following the RAMESES guidelines. The authors propose an explanatory model for the interventions examined and a conceptual framework that can be used as a starting point for the study of effective IPC/IPE interventions within clinical settings. Finally, this realist review highlights discrepancies in the terminology and methodology used to study similar cases, which will need to be systematically tackled by future research to further our understanding of those cases and of key elements of IPC/IPE in clinical working groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.