Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756669›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development

Interprofessional Collaboration and Interprofessional Education Interventions in Clinical Healthcare Settings: A Realist Review.

Gerard Balague-Viladrich, Frederico Matos, Cristina Monforte-Royo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerard Balague-ViladrichUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-9644
Frederico MatosUniversity of the Arts London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2534-0891
Cristina Monforte-RoyoUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-4623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and interprofessional education (IPE) are two concepts that have gained interest during the last decade, for the positive change they enable, especially in clinical healthcare settings. Despite this surge of attention, there are few studies that systematically analyse interventions aiming at fostering IPC/IPE within clinical teams. Developing additional knowledge around factors that impact the efficiency of similarly targeted interventions can help improve the quality of patient care in clinical settings. To this end, the paper offers a systematic, realist review of the IPC/IPE interventions outlined in the literature, seeking to better understand how the context and mechanisms which shape these interventions interact to produce the desired outcomes (ie, improve IPC). Electronic databases searched were PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and were analysed independently by two reviewers following the RAMESES guidelines. The authors propose an explanatory model for the interventions examined and a conceptual framework that can be used as a starting point for the study of effective IPC/IPE interventions within clinical settings. Finally, this realist review highlights discrepancies in the terminology and methodology used to study similar cases, which will need to be systematically tackled by future research to further our understanding of those cases and of key elements of IPC/IPE in clinical working groups.

Indexed as

conceptual frameworkexplanatory modelinterprofessional careinterprofessional collaborationinterprofessional educationinterventions in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41756669
PMCPMC12932884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.