Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756642›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Mortality of apricot rootstocks and scions.

Edina Mendelné Pászti, Géza Bujdosó, Gideon Sikwah Narteh, Zoltán Szabó, Ákos Mendel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edina Mendelné PásztiFruit Growing Research Center, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Géza BujdosóFruit Growing Research Center, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Gideon Sikwah NartehFruit Growing Research Center, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SzabóFruit Growing Research Center, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos MendelFruit Growing Research Center, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim of our study is to assess the stability and profitability of apricot production by selecting some rootstock and scions among Hungarian climate conditions, that are good adapted to the changing climate. Comparative experiments will be conducted to gain comprehensive knowledge, including their impact on vegetative and generative development, viability, and mortality in new plantations. The experiment utilized a randomized block design, incorporating five rootstocks and 16 apricot scions, resulting in a total of 960 trees planted at a distance of 3 x 5 meters. The survival rate is expressed as a percentage of the initially planted trees for each combination. It can be concluded that rootstocks with vigorous growth, such as 'Montcar' and 'Rootpac R', were better suited to the climatic and soil conditions of the Hungarian lowlands compared to rootstocks with moderate growth potential, such as 'Fehér besztercei' and 'Wavit'. This is due to their particularly vigorous root growth, which helps to maintain the plantation condition.

Indexed as

different rootstocksHungarynon-bearing periodsurvival rateTCSA

Identifiers

PMID41756642
PMCPMC12934280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.