ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Association between dietary inflammation index and frailty among community medical staff.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between the Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) and frailty among community medical staff. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used to select community healthcare staff from Pudong New Area, Shanghai, between March and September 2024. Demographic characteristics were collected using a general information questionnaire. Dietary nutrient intakes were obtained via 24-hour dietary recall, and DII was calculated. Frailty status was assessed using the Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the correlation between DII and frailty, and a restricted cubic spline model was used to explore the dose-response relationship. Results: Among 377 healthcare staff, 23 (6.1%) were frail, and 227 (60.2%) were pre-frail. The DII scores ranged from -4.02 to 3.73. The frail group had significantly higher DII scores than the pre-frail and non-frail groups, with statistical significance in DII quartile grouping. Logistic regression analysis showed that for each unit increase in DII absolute value, the risk of frailty increased approximately 3.4 times after adjusting for covariates (95% CI: 1.439 ~ 8.198, Conclusion: Frailty among community healthcare medical staff is influenced by DII. Maintaining DII within a reasonable range may help prevent frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.