ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
"Hopeless but supported in that hopelessness": a qualitative study of how people experience talking to a GP about suicide.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informal carers' perception on perspective taking when reporting as proxies about someone else's health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The experiences of 'Suicide Prevention Champions' in the UK National Health Service (NHS): A qualitative investigation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is evidence that help-seeking escalates in the weeks before death by suicide, with general practice being the most common last point of contact. The experiences of people seeking support for suicidal thoughts and feelings in primary care is under-explored. Understanding the perspectives of people experiencing suicidal thoughts and feelings may identify innovative ways to assess risk in primary care in a safe and collaborative way, allowing more opportunity for intervention. The aim of the current qualitative study was to explore individual experiences of talking to a GP about suicide to understand how they perceive these interactions. Methods: This study was developed with people who have lived experience of suicidality and support seeking, who also supported the interpretation of data and informed the dissemination plan. A participatory, consultative approach was adopted, with experts by experience involved flexibly at multiple stages of the research. Participation was strengths-based and care-informed, prioritising choice, comfort, and psychological safety. Data were collected using an online qualitative survey that was distributed using social media. Forty-one responses were inductively analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Participants were aged between 19 and 67 years old, 29 were female, nine male, two non-binary, and one did not disclose their gender. Results: Three overarching themes were identified: 1) Challenges disclosing suicidal thoughts and feelings: " Discussion: These findings have implications for practice largely connected to a need for relationally informed responses to suicidality that promote more compassionate, contextually responsive mental health care. Methodologically, the paper demonstrates the value of participatory, lived experience-led research grounded in trust, reciprocity, and collaboration beyond tokenism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.