ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Exploring the Barriers Faced by Medical Students and the Impact of Their Involvement in a Widening Participation Charity.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Few studies have explored the challenges faced by medical students from widening participation (WP) backgrounds compared to their non-WP peers. This study aimed to identify these challenges in medical school and evaluate how well a national charity enabled them to address these challenges. Participants and Methods: A 26-item online Qualtrics questionnaire was circulated to all medical student volunteers within the charity Medics & Me. This explored potential challenges faced by students, including finances, networking opportunities, career development, and their sense of belonging in medical school. Fischer's exact test and unpaired Results: Forty-seven out of a national cohort of 196 Medics & Me medical student volunteers (23.9%) responded to the questionnaire. 19 were from a WP background and 28 from non-WP backgrounds. WP students were significantly more likely than non-WP students to feel that finances impacted their studies (p=0.0152), more likely to work to fund their studies (p=0.0011), and less likely to consider their medical school as inclusive to the needs of all students. (p=0.0267). All students cited poor support with career development, networking, and pastoral care, and a feeling that they did not belong. Positive aspects of Medics & Me included the sense of community and networking opportunities. Key themes for improvement included clearer guidance for developing career portfolios, more networking opportunities, and closer working with medical schools. Discussion: WP students reported significantly more concerns with finances and belonging than non-WP students. All students scored their medical school poorly for support, particularly regarding career development and networking opportunities. Medics & Me should consider supporting students with career development and networking opportunities and work closely with faculty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.