ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Clinical insights on sialography in the era of modern imaging: A case report of 5 cases.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sialography offers a unique advantage for mapping the salivary duct network and identifying structural inconsistencies. It clearly demonstrates the presence and extent of benign obstructions, dilatations, and ductal variations that may appear only as nonspecific sialadenitis on ultrasonography. Furthermore, the flow and composition of the contrast media provide a therapeutic benefit. This case series, supported by comprehensively annotated procedural images, highlights the merits of sialography as a corroborative diagnostic tool-especially when point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) fails to accurately detect microliths or subtle ductal discrepancies. This article provides an oral healthcare professional's perspective on diagnosing benign obstructive salivary gland disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.