ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Madura foot: Atypical MRI presentation beyond the classic dot-in-circle sign.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Madura foot is a chronic, progressive granulomatous infection caused by either fungi or bacteria. It commonly occurs in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly among individuals exposed to soil through barefoot walking. We report the case of a 20-year-old female from rural Somaliland with a two-year history of progressive swelling of the left foot associated with purulent discharge. She had previously undergone two surgical debridements, but no definitive diagnosis was established. MRI demonstrated a few classic dot-in-circle signs along with predominantly atypical bone cavities that exhibited similar signal characteristics. These lesions replaced the normal marrow of the midfoot, consistent with advanced mycetoma. The diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by histopathological examination. This case emphasizes the diagnostic value of MRI, particularly in identifying advanced and atypical features of mycetoma, while also highlighting the necessity of histopathological confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.