Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756534›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral & maxillofacial research

Temporal Vessels: An Established Recipient Site for Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reported Outcomes.

Evangelos N Vitkos, Christos Tsilivigkos, Nefeli Eleni Kounatidou, Athanassios Kyrgidis, Konstantinos Kotzagiorgis, Amer Alkhateeb, Lars Bonitz, Stefan Haßfeld, Christian Soemmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evangelos N VitkosDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.
Christos TsilivigkosFirst Department of Otolaryngology, Hippokration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, AthensGreece.
Nefeli Eleni KounatidouDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hamburg - Eppendorf, HamburgGermany.
Athanassios KyrgidisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGreece.
Konstantinos KotzagiorgisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.
Amer AlkhateebDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.
Lars BonitzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.
Stefan HaßfeldDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.
Christian SoemmerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/WittenGermany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical utility of superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels for free flap reconstruction in the maxillofacial region. Given their favourable anatomy and potential advantages in previously treated or vessel-depleted necks, we synthesised available evidence on complication rates, flap viability, and recipient site morbidity. Material and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed. Studies were included if they reported outcomes of free flap maxillofacial reconstructions using temporal vessels for microvascular anastomosis. Primary outcomes were arterial and venous thrombosis or compromise, and overall vascular complications. Secondary outcomes included return to theatre, flap necrosis, salvage rates, and recipient site complications. A random-effects model was used for data pooling, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I Results: Twenty-one studies reporting 773 reconstructions in 759 patients were included. Arterial thrombosis/compromise occurred in 1.44%, venous in 5.13%, with an overall vascular complication rate of 7.24%. Return to theatre occurred in 7.72% and flap salvage in 4.23%. Partial and total flap necrosis rates were 2.14% and 4.05% respectively. Recipient site complications were reported in 10.43% of cases. Conclusions: Superficial temporal vessels demonstrate reliable outcomes with complication rates comparable to cervical vessels. Their use may reduce surgical morbidity and should be considered a viable primary recipient option in complex head and neck reconstructions.

Indexed as

maxillofacial surgerymeta-analysisreconstructive surgical proceduressurgical flapstemporal arteries

Identifiers

PMID41756534
PMCPMC12933245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.