ArticleResearch square2026
Historic drought shifted fishing from a stigmatized practice and food to an adaptive livelihood among Daasanach pastoralists in northern Kenya.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Droughts disrupt livelihoods, forcing populations to adapt. This study examines how drought-driven livelihood stress is shifting Daasanach pastoralists' perceptions of and engagement with once stigmatized practices-fishing and eating fish-in northern Kenya. Methods: This study used mixed methods within the Daasanach Human Biology Project to assess variations in fish consumption and dietary patterns across pre-drought, drought, and post-drought periods. Qualitative data gathered through six focus group discussions (FGDs) provided insight into experiences of food insecurity, coping strategies, and livelihood adjustments, thereby enriching the interpretation of previously collected quantitative trends in fish consumption. Results: Between 2019 and 2024, the onset of a historic drought led to increased fish consumption that persisted post-drought. Findings reveal four interrelated themes. First, fishing changed from a stigmatized coping strategy associated with poverty to a respected livelihood conferring social status. Second, food insecurity catalyzed diversification in food culture, with fish becoming an accepted staple protein following widespread livestock loss. Third, fishing functioned as a pathway to economic and social adaptation, enabling households to purchase food, rebuild assets, support children's education, and enhance women's economic autonomy. Finally, this adaptation carried unintended consequences, including crocodile attacks, challenges related to fishing equipment and markets, and water-related illnesses. Conclusion: Fishing, initially adopted as a temporary coping mechanism, has become an integral livelihood due to the drought. Diversifying livelihoods can mitigate food insecurity and enhance resilience among pastoralists confronting climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.