ArticleResearch square2026
Body-weight support is the primary driver of elevated walking cost in cerebral palsy.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) exhibit substantially elevated energetic costs of walking, yet the biomechanical origins of this excessive cost remain unclear, limiting the effectiveness of current interventions. Methods: We tested the hypothesis that elevated energetic cost of walking in CP arises primarily from increased demands for body-weight support and lateral stabilization. Using a custom mechatronic system, we independently applied controlled vertical body-weight support (1-60% body weight) and mediolateral stabilization stiffness (50-1500 N/m) while children with CP and typically developing (TD) peers walked on a treadmill at a fixed nondimensional speed. We quantified steady-state energetic cost using indirect calorimetry and used linear regression models to determine energetic responses to each intervention. Results: Providing body-weight support significantly reduced net energetic cost in both groups, with a 3.5-fold greater effect in children with CP (n = 23) compared to TD peers (n = 10). Across the 1-60% support range, energetic cost decreased by 41% in CP, normalizing walking energy expenditure to TD levels. Higher baseline energetic cost of walking and greater knee flexion during stance were associated with larger energetic reductions (p < 0.01). In contrast, mediolateral stabilization produced negligible energetic effects in both CP (n = 14) and TD groups, with no demographic or biomechanical predictors of response. Conclusions: Body-weight support is the dominant contributor to elevated energetic cost of walking in children with CP, whereas lateral stabilization contributes minimally under the conditions tested. These findings identify gravitational support as a key biomechanical target for energy-focused rehabilitation and assistive technology interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.