Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756434›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Modeling the effect of drug courts in North Carolina counties.

Nikolas Lindauer, David Kline, Samrachana Adhikari, Amanda M Bunting, Staci A Hepler

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikolas LindauerDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Wake Forest University.
David KlineDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
Samrachana AdhikariDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
Amanda M BuntingDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
Staci A HeplerDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Wake Forest University.

Funding

Spatio-temporal Methods for Surveillance of the Opioid SyndemicR01DA052214 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HEPLER, STACI, KLINE, DAVID M · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Illicit opioid overdose death rates drastically increased across North Carolina through 2023. We sought to study the impact of drug courts and what conditions can make their presence more or less effective. Methods: We analyzed counts of illicit opioid overdose deaths for each county in North Carolina from 2017 - 2023. Bayesian Poisson autoregressive models are used to model the change in illicit opioid overdose death rates. We included an indicator of drug court presence in the model and used interaction terms to quantify effect heterogeneity. We used our model to estimate counterfactual outcomes and quantify the effect of drug courts. Results: We found drug courts were associated with decreases in illicit opioid overdose death rates, and that the effect was heterogeneous across North Carolina. We estimated a large protective effect in counties with fewer drug possession arrests, after controlling for other covariates. Conclusion: Diversion into drug courts can provide an effective pathway to reducing the overdose crisis, but the effectiveness of drug courts depends on other features of the county.

Indexed as

autoregressiveBayesiancourtsinterventionopioid overdosespatial

Identifiers

PMID41756434
PMCPMC12934984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.