ArticleResearch square2026
Hot Mitochondria and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondria are central hubs of cellular bioenergetics, converting chemical free energy into ATP while inevitably releasing heat during respiration. Fluorescence-based thermometry has been interpreted to show intracellular "hot spots" more than 10 °C above the bulk physiological temperature, implying that mitochondria might operate far outside conventional thermal bounds. Such claims, however, appear inconsistent with basic biophysics: the small size of mitochondria, their aqueous and highly conductive environment, and their limited power output all argue against large steady-state temperature gradients. This discrepancy has prompted renewed scrutiny of both the physical limits of intracellular heat transfer and the biological interpretation of nanoscale thermal measurements. A key open question is whether nonequilibrium biochemical processes, such as respiration-driven proton pumping, could act as nanoscale heat pumps that maintain higher local temperatures than allowed by passive diffusion alone. Here, we develop a model-independent thermodynamic analysis based solely on the Second Law of Thermodynamics to bound the maximal temperature difference that any biochemically driven mechanism can sustain across the inner mitochondrial membrane and show that even under idealized conditions the achievable temperature rise is restricted to a small fraction of a degree, effectively closing this loophole.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.