Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756387›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.

Chenglin Mou, Jinbin Yang, Qingmei Wu, Lian Qin, Junyu Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenglin Mou *Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jinbin Yang *Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Qingmei WuIntensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Lian QinIntensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Junyu LuIntensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and healthcare expenditures among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Its pathophysiology is complex and its clinical manifestations are highly heterogeneous; early identification and timely, targeted interventions are essential to improving outcomes. With the widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and the rapid expansion of critical care data, developing sepsis prediction models using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has become an active area of research. This review provides a systematic overview of advances in sepsis prediction, from clinical problem framing and outcome definitions to data sources, feature engineering, and methodological evolution. We summarize the progression from traditional scoring systems (e.g., SOFA, qSOFA) to modern ML algorithms (e.g., gradient boosting trees, random forests) and time series DL models (e.g., LSTM, Transformer models). We also outline reporting and evaluation standards (e.g., TRIPOD AI), and synthesize evidence on representative models for early warning, prognostic risk stratification, and prediction of organ dysfunction. Key translational challenges are discussed, including generalization, fairness, model drift, workflow integration, alarm fatigue, and real world utility. Finally, we highlight opportunities in multimodal data fusion, causal inference, federated learning, and digital twins for building next generation, clinically actionable sepsis intelligence, and we offer practical recommendations to help move from algorithmic accuracy to demonstrable clinical value, emphasizing that only models that are externally validated, well calibrated, prospectively evaluated, and tightly aligned with clinical workflows are likely to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportdeep learningmachine learningmultimodal dataprediction modelssepsistranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID41756387
PMCPMC12932579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.