Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41756373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Enduring insights from sex differences in COVID-19: a retrospective

Carmine Siniscalchi, Angela Guerra, Nicoletta Cerundolo, Pierpaolo Di Micco, Claudio Tana, Beatrice Prati, Alberto Parise, Antonio Nouvenne, Tiziana Meschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carmine SiniscalchiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Angela GuerraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Nicoletta CerundoloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Pierpaolo Di MiccoInternal Medicine Ward "P.O. Santa Maria delle Grazie" Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy.
Claudio TanaInternal Medicine Unit, Eastern Hospital, Asl Taranto, Italy.
Beatrice PratiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Alberto PariseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Antonio NouvenneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Tiziana MeschiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, before containment strategies and without vaccines or targeted therapies, clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients were heterogeneous. Preliminary reports suggested possible sex-related differences in susceptibility and disease severity. This study examined sex-based differences in clinical presentation, radiological involvement, laboratory findings, and in-hospital outcomes among patients admitted during the pre-lockdown phase of the outbreak in Italy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 689 consecutive adults hospitalized at Parma University Hospital between 28 February and 22 March 2020, with chest CT findings consistent with COVID-19-related interstitial pneumonia, regardless of RT-PCR results. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory parameters, and outcomes were compared between males and females. Lung involvement was quantified using a CT visual score. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of in-hospital mortality. Results: Females accounted for 39% of the cohort and were significantly older and frailer than males, with a higher prevalence of Rockwood ≥7 (15 vs. 5%). Despite this, females demonstrated a lower CT visual score (25 vs. 30%), higher oxygenation parameters, and a less pronounced inflammatory and tissue-damage profile, including lower CRP, LDH, and CPK. Females had shorter hospital stays (5 vs. 6 days) and lower age-adjusted mortality. Multivariable analysis confirmed female sex as independently protective (OR 0.597), an effect largely mediated by reduced radiological lung involvement and attenuated inflammatory response. Conclusions: Females showed milder radiological and biochemical profiles and reduced mortality despite being older and frailer. These findings highlight intrinsic sex-related biological differences in host response. These early patterns remain relevant today, as sex-specific vulnerability may inform precision medicine and risk stratification.

Indexed as

COVID-19frailtyinflammatory biomarkersnon-vaccinated populationradiological severitySARS-CoV-2sex differences

Identifiers

PMID41756373
PMCPMC12932140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.