ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinical trials of bispecific antibody therapy for colorectal cancer: advanced and next steps.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling EGFR, c-MET, and B7H3 co-expression to guide next-generation dual-drug conjugate strategies in colorectal cancer.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
- Bispecific antibodies in gastrointestinal cancers: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumor with a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. The existing treatment methods have limitations in terms of efficacy or applicable population. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) can simultaneously target two different antigens and are expected to overcome tumor immune escape, providing a new strategy for the treatment of CRC. Method: This study systematically retrieved clinical trial registration platforms such as Trialtrove and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July and November 2025, and collected trial data on the treatment of CRC with BsAbs. Descriptive analyses were conducted on key indicators such as the stage distribution, primary endpoints, funding types, global distribution, and target combinations of the trials by establishing clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. Result: A total of 192 clinical trials were included. Since 2018, the number of related trials has significantly increased, and the trial phase has shifted from mainly Phase I in the early stage to a substantial growth in Phase II and Phase III trials after 2023-2024. The primary endpoints of the trial were highly concentrated on safety assessment (such as safety/tolerability, adverse events). The industrial sector is the main funder (68.3%), and the number of trials conducted in China (n=125) ranks first in the world. The target combinations are most commonly PD-1/CTLA-4 and PD-1/VEGF, and studies on novel combinations such as EGFR/cMET are also on the rise. Efficacy data from key trials (e.g., Cadonilimab, Amivantamab) demonstrate encouraging response rates in both locally advanced and metastatic settings, particularly in MSS/pMMR populations. Conclusion: The clinical research and development activities of BsAbs in the field of CRC treatment are becoming increasingly active and mature. Currently, the focus is on establishing a safety profile. Dual-target blocking based on PD-1 and strategies targeting EGFR/cMET are the current main research and development directions. In contrast to resource-intensive CAR-T or payload-driven ADCs, BsAbs provide a ready-to-use therapeutic format that simultaneously engages two antigens, offering distinct practical and mechanistic benefits. In the future, it is necessary to further optimize the design of BsAbs, explore combination therapies and identify predictive biomarkers to promote its clinical transformation and improve the prognosis of CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.