ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Hydraulic endorectal actuator for prostate radiotherapy reduces variations in motion in a silicone rectal phantom.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accuracy and morbidity of prostate cancer radiotherapy are influenced by unpredictable variations in rectal filling and patient motion. We developed a soft robotic hydraulic endorectal actuator that aims to reduce rectal motion and retract the rectum to restore the anorectal angle, improve target accuracy, and reduce toxicity during prostate cancer radiotherapy. The ability of the endorectal actuator to stabilize the rectum and improve prostate radiotherapy outcomes has not yet been assessed. This study evaluates the actuator's performance in a simulated rectal phantom. Methods: We fabricated a rectal phantom using silicone and motor-controlled elastic ribbons to simulate muscle tone and control the phantom diameter. The rectal compliance of the phantom was validated using a barostat balloon and was deliberately set low to simulate a high resistance to distension to challenge the actuator's capabilities. We assessed the actuator's ability to (1) resist dynamic peristaltic forces and (2) reproduce the rectal position and anorectal angle from varying initial displacements. The anterior-posterior rectal diameter and anterior rectal wall (ARW) displacements were measured using video tracker software. Results: The phantom demonstrated a rectal compliance of 4.19 ml/mmHg within the 40 ml-60 ml volume range, meeting the low-compliance target. During dynamic compression, the endorectal actuator reduced the change in the anterior-posterior diameter and ARW displacement from 25 mm and 15 mm, respectively, to less than 5 mm in both. The actuator reduced the increase in rectal volume from 132.3 cm Conclusion: Within this rectal phantom, the endorectal actuator reduced the variations in rectal motion. These findings suggest that the actuator may improve target accuracy and reduce radiation-induced toxicity in prostate radiotherapy, pending
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.