ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
An interpretable deep learning framework based on TabNet-Cox for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Therapeutic outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are highly heterogeneous. Accurate prognostic assessment is essential for risk stratification and clinical management. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable deep-learning survival model, TabNet-Cox, for predicting overall survival (OS) in ICI-treated HCC patients. Methods: A total of 453 consecutive HCC patients treated with ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 339) and an internal validation cohort (n = 114). An independent external validation cohort of 105 patients was collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University under the same inclusion criteria. Baseline demographic variables, tumor characteristics, pretreatment management categories (surgery, locoregional therapy, or none), and laboratory parameters were used to develop TabNet-Cox. Model performance was assessed under a repeated 5-fold cross-validation protocol and further evaluated in the internal and external cohorts using the concordance index (C-index), AUC, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and unsupervised clustering were applied for interpretability and phenotype exploration. Clinical utility was examined using decision curve analysis (DCA) with BCLC stage as the reference. Results: TabNet-Cox showed the best overall performance among the survival models compared, achieving a C-index of 0.79 and an AUC of 0.81 with the lowest Brier score (0.059) in the development setting. In the external validation cohort, TabNet-Cox demonstrated stable discriminative performance, with well-defined ROC curves and good calibration. Using the prespecified risk cut-off, the model effectively stratified patients into distinct risk groups, yielding significantly separated Kaplan-Meier survival curves (P < 0.001). SHAP analysis highlighted AFP, GGT, and LDH as major risk contributors, whereas albumin and lymphocyte count were protective. Unsupervised clustering within high-risk patients suggested two patterns, a tumor burden-dominant phenotype and a liver dysfunction-dominant phenotype, which should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Conclusion: TabNet-Cox provides an accurate and interpretable framework for OS prediction and risk stratification in ICI-treated HCC using routinely available baseline variables. Its performance was supported by resampling-based evaluation and independent external validation, supporting its potential value for individualized prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.