SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Rationale for investigating the use of anifrolumab in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a combined narrative and case-based systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine-learning-derived online prediction model for risk during the activity period in SLE patients: a retrospective historical cross-sectional study.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
- Immunopathogenesis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: current insights into inflammatory and thrombotic pathways.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuropsychiatric (NP) involvement represents one of the major challenges in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), often requiring individualized therapeutic strategies. While anifrolumab inhibits the type I interferon receptor 1 (IFNAR1) and is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe SLE, randomized controlled trials have not evaluated its efficacy in NPSLE. Methods: We examined the pathophysiological rationale for inhibiting IFN-α using anifrolumab in NPSLE. To supplement this, we report an original case of NPSLE successfully treated with anifrolumab, along with similar cases identified through a systematic literature review (SLR) of Medline/PubMed and Embase, performed in accordance with PRISMA and CABARET guidelines. Results: Overexpression of IFN-α is linked to neurological symptoms in patients with inflammatory NPSLE, such as psychosis and seizures. Blocking the IFNAR1 with anifrolumab provides a direct rationale for treating this subset of NPSLE. The SLR identified seven case reports of female patients with inflammatory NPSLE where anifrolumab was used as a rescue therapy following conventional treatment failure. NPSLE manifestations were heterogeneous, including psychosis, headache, and acute confusional state, which limits the generalizability of our findings. A 52-year-old female with SLE and seizures from our Lupus Clinic who received anifrolumab after failing multiple treatments was also reported. After an average of 11.7 months, all patients showed improvement, 87% (7 out 8) achieving complete NP symptom resolution and 62% reaching SLE remission. No emerging safety issues were reported. Conclusion: Preliminary observations suggest a potential benefit of anifrolumab in NPSLE, but evidence remains insufficient to establish clinical efficacy and warrants further controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.