ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2026
Association between diet quality and the oral microbiome in three US cohort studies.
Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The oral microbiome has been associated with overall health, but the contribution of dietary habits to oral microbial composition is not well understood. Objective: We evaluated the association between diet quality (Healthy Eating Index [HEI] 2015) and the oral microbiome in the Agricultural Health Study, NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, and Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial within 5,546 participants. Methods: Individual HEI components were scored from FFQ data and summed. Alpha and beta diversity and genus-level presence and relative abundance were estimated. The proportion of variability in the beta diversity matrices explained by diet quality and other covariates were calculated. Linear, logistic, and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models with adjustment for confounders were used and cohort-specific estimates were meta-analyzed. Results: Age explained the largest variability in beta diversity (Bray-Curtis), followed by smoking, education, and the HEI component for added sugar. Although overall diet quality was not associated with alpha diversity overall, the added sugar component was consistently inversely associated with alpha diversity. At the genus-level, most of the identified associations were with added sugar. Conclusions: Consumption of added sugars was consistently associated with oral microbial diversity and specific genera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.