ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Combination of oncolytic viruses and immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of high-grade gliomas.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus for Glioblastoma: Molecular Engineering, Tumor Microenvironment Barriers, and Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Meningeal immunity and "Interstitial" therapy: a new paradigm for immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGG) such as glioblastoma are the most aggressive primary malignancies of the central nervous system. The median overall survival of glioblastoma is <15 months despite treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, stressing the need for additional therapeutics. Immunotherapy such as checkpoint blockade is ineffective in HGG patients owing to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Oncolytic viruses that preferentially infect and kill cancer cells represent another novel therapeutic approach and are under development for HGG treatment. We reviewed the efficacy of oncolytic viruses in HGG treatment in preclinical and clinical studies and gathered evidence suggesting the feasibility and advantage of combining oncolytic virotherapy with checkpoint blockade. We found that significant therapeutic effects of various oncolytic viruses have been validated in preclinical HGG models, but the clinical efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy alone is limited. Accumulation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and upregulation of immune checkpoints within tumor microenvironment following virotherapy justify the use of checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oncolytic viruses. Preliminary results indicate this combination may yield enhanced efficacy in HGG treatment. These findings suggest that oncolytic viruses combined with immunotherapy such as checkpoint blockade may have superior efficacy compared with virotherapy alone. Future studies should further assess this hypothesis using different combinations of oncolytic viruses and checkpoint inhibitors. Combined oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy may become an effective treatment modality to improve the survival of HGG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.